Comments for Constitutional Reset

Comment on Presidential Tracking Poll– 45% Strongly Disapprove by gmiller

gmiller — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:21:14 +0000

Amen,Quig, especially as he will try to maximize bailouts, entitlements and other bribes to endear hinself to the sheeple before the elections.

Comment on Presidential Tracking Poll– 45% Strongly Disapprove by PD Quig

PD Quig — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:11:58 +0000

I was really gunning for -30 by December, but that seems out of the realm of possibility now. It would probably be better if the Obama low occurs later in 2010 anyway as a final crash leading into the elections.

Comment on Media Finally Starting to Rebel on Obama? by Carol

Carol — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:18:17 +0000

Funny! Even here, his lips were moving when he said “you’ll get your money.” And this BHO is better looking than the real one! I notice the polling for both questions is in the 75% range. Could it be — people are waking up?

Comment on A Partnership Offer You Can’t Refuse by David M Stewart

David M Stewart — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:41:22 +0000

You beat me to it, I was going to put that up. I am really glad you did. I saw it yesterday as I was catching up on all my email.

Comment on The Day the Dollar Died by Mark E.

Mark E. — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:24:23 +0000

George,

That was an interesting read and in some ways communicates more about the potential for collapse than the typical technical discussion.

Thanks much, Mark

Comment on Dollars and Sense by Laurence

Laurence — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:52:37 +0000

George,
In the Obama-Keyes debate in 2004, Obama conceded (admitted) that he was born in Kenya. CSPAN aired the debate uncut in April 2005. In the televised debate, when Keyes mentioned that Obama was foreign-born, Obama replied, “So what, I’m not running for President.” This is on record. Televised.
Why is this not evidence enough in itself to present to a court or a judge (or to Congress) that our President knowingly ran for the Office (and has spent millions trying to hide the truth)? Probably the reason he has sealed all of his past records - I repeat ALL - is because on many such documents one’s birthplace is entered… and he did not decide he had better be U.S.-born until sometime in 2006, when he began considering running for the Presidency.
I don’t know which would infuriate our founders the most - a man cheating to become President, or a man breaking a store window and running off with a TV. It requires the same mind-set…

Comment on We want you to leave your comments…Let it roll by Sandy

Sandy — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:57:11 +0000

Hey George
Tell me how you really feel about the T.F. article—ha ha
Better still, come to the movie –Sat., Nov. 21 - 7:00 p.m. - Film: NOT EVIL JUST WRONG
Regards,
Sandy

Comment on What They Really Believe by Colony14Author

Colony14Author — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:35:02 +0000

Increased solar activity causes a portion of the gamma rays headed toward the earth to be deflected. Because gamma rays in the atmosphere encourage cloud formation, fewer gamma rays means fewer clouds - and that means higher average temperatures.

When solar activity is low, more gamma rays enter the atmosphere and more clouds are created. More clouds means lower average temperatures.

Scientists have identified a STRONG correlation between solar activity, clouds, and temperature - much stronger than Gore’s CO2-to-temperature alleged correlations. Rising CO2 levels FOLLOW rising temperatures because of ocean evaporation of the oceans; CO2 does not cause the higher temperatures.)

We have been in a period of reduced solar activity, and the average earth temperature has been falling as a result. We may be facing a lengthy period of lower-than-average temperatures - which would have far more harmful consequences on mankind than rising temperatures - worldwide famine, for example, as crops fail because of cold weather and too much rain.

The facts dispute the global-warming alarmists’ arguments. Of course, the facts don’t support global wold socialism, so they must be ignored by Gore, Obama, and their comrades.

Read The Obama Timeline and be very frightened…

Comment on What They Really Believe by gmiller

gmiller — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:13:09 +0000

David:

I have done my research and Friedman is partially correct. Although the USA has made discovery harder, our oil reserves are down. Read Peak Oil and Twilight in the Desert. However, we could retrieve a lot more than we are now, but it is unlikely we could ever get back to our former levels. Most new oil here and abroad is far more difficult and expensive to access. Even abroad, in nearly unrestricted exploration areas, cost is getting higher and supplies more scarce. We will have to drill like crazy, even to maintain a diminishing supply, while working on alternatives, like nuclear. Solar and wind will not scale up to replace existing fossil fules inn the foreseeable future, gas and coal will be mainstays for a long time. Ethanol is acruel, expenive, polluting joke, that is also detracting from our food supply and increasing costs mightily.

It is far too soon to kick out the crutch.

Comment on What They Really Believe by David M Stewart

David M Stewart — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:00:06 +0000

Tom and all his green cohort always base their entire argument on a completely false premise of a shortage of oil and “What happens, of course, is that the price of oil goes through the roof — unless we develop alternatives. The petro-dictators in Iran, Venezuela and Russia hope we don’t. They would only get richer.”
The oil shortage (fantasy) in the US is the result of GOVERNMENT control of the ability to drill inside the borders of the USA. We have a very large supply of oil and between our reserves and Canada’s reserves we would not have to buy a drop of Middle Eastern Oil. Just do the research on oil reserves.
Regards,
David M Stewart 11-20-2009